These are the terms on which LegitReviewing makes legitreviewing.com available to you, written as questions because those are the questions we get. If you disagree with them, the right response is to stop using the site.
What am I agreeing to by using this site?
By loading a page on legitreviewing.com, sending us a message, or otherwise using what we publish, you accept these terms as they stand. There is no account to create and no box to tick. Use is acceptance.
They sit alongside our privacy notice and together the two form the whole arrangement between you and LegitReviewing. Nothing said in an email or a social media post overrides them unless it is a written agreement signed on our behalf. The version published at the time of your visit governs that visit, and the current edition is dated 2026.
Is anything here legal or financial advice?
No. This is the most important paragraph on the page, so we will not soften it. LegitReviewing publishes journalism and commentary about fraudulent financial operations. It is general information addressed to the public, not legal, financial, investment or tax advice.
We do not know your circumstances, your jurisdiction, the documents you signed or the evidence you hold. Nothing on legitreviewing.com creates a lawyer and client relationship, an advisory relationship, or a duty of care towards you. If you need advice, engage a regulated professional in your own country. If you are reporting a crime, contact the police and the relevant financial regulator directly.
How does LegitReviewing decide what to publish?
We start from documents. Regulator warning lists and enforcement notices. Company registration records, or the absence of them. Licence registers, or the discovery that a claimed licence number belongs to someone else. Court filings, domain registration data, archived copies of pages since edited.
On top of that sits reader testimony. Where several unconnected accounts line up with each other and with the documentary record, that pattern is evidence worth reporting. We try to say which category a statement falls into: verified fact, reasonable inference, or opinion.
Are your reviews statements of fact?
Partly, and it matters which part. Verifiable claims are presented as facts: that a company appears on a named regulator’s warning list, that a domain was registered on a given date, that a claimed office address is a virtual mailbox. Those we can evidence.
Conclusions are opinion. When an article says a platform shows the hallmarks of a fraudulent operation, that is our honest opinion formed on the facts described in the same piece, from sources readers can check and disagree with. Ratings and warning labels are opinion in compressed form. They are editorial judgment, not certifications.
My company is named on legitreviewing.com, what can I do?
Contact us at contact@legitreviewing.com and we will engage seriously. Getting things right is the whole point of the work, and a subject who supplies real evidence is doing us a favour.
Tell us which article and which passage you dispute. Complaints that a piece is defamatory in general terms are hard to act on. Point at the sentence, explain what is wrong, and send what supports your position: licence documentation, corporate filings, correspondence, proof that a warning was withdrawn.
If your factual position holds up we correct the text and say so. If the dispute is one of interpretation, we may annotate the piece with your position instead. Where a claim is shown to be unfounded, the material comes down. What we will not do is remove accurate reporting because it is commercially inconvenient.
How do I request a correction?
Any reader can, not only the businesses we write about. Email contact@legitreviewing.com with the page address, the passage in question, what you believe the accurate position to be, and a source if you have one.
We acknowledge requests promptly and aim to decide within a couple of weeks, longer if the checking is involved. Substantive corrections are marked on the article so the record stays visible; typographical fixes are made silently. We do not quietly rewrite the substance of a published piece and pretend the earlier version never existed.
What am I not allowed to do on this site?
Most of this is obvious, but it needs stating. You must not:
- Send information you know to be false, or invent an account of a fraud that did not happen to you;
- Use the contact form to harass, threaten or abuse anyone, including our staff;
- Attempt unauthorised access to legitreviewing.com, its servers, its database or any account on it;
- Introduce malware, run vulnerability scans without written permission, or disrupt the service;
- Bulk harvest content at a rate that burdens the site, or extract our material to train commercial models without a licence;
- Impersonate another person, a regulator, a law enforcement body or a member of our team;
- Use anything published here to intimidate, dox or retaliate against an individual;
- Post or transmit unlawful, obscene or infringing material;
- Advertise services to our readers through the contact form, including anything presented as help for victims;
- Use the site in a way that breaks the law where you are or where we are.
We take the ninth point especially seriously. People defrauded once are targeted again by operations offering assistance for a fee. Anyone using our channels to find them will be blocked and, where warranted, reported.
Can I republish your articles?
The text, images and structure on legitreviewing.com belong to LegitReviewing or our licensors and are protected by copyright. You may read the site, print pages for your own use, and share links freely.
Quoting is fine within the ordinary limits of fair dealing and fair use: a short extract, attributed to LegitReviewing, with a link to the original page. Republishing a whole article, or systematically reproducing large parts of the site, needs written permission. Ask at contact@legitreviewing.com. Requests from journalists, researchers and consumer bodies are generally granted.
Who are the legal advisers you mention?
Independent professionals and firms who assist people in preparing and filing reports to regulators, financial authorities and law enforcement. They are not employees of LegitReviewing and are not part of our editorial operation.
If you ask, and only if you ask, we make an introduction. From that point the relationship is between you and them. They set their own terms, fees and scope of work, and you should read those documents carefully. We do not supervise the work, provide legal services, or hold client money. Anyone claiming to represent legitreviewing.com in return for a payment is not connected with us, and we want to hear about it at contact@legitreviewing.com.
Are you responsible for sites you link to?
No. Outbound links exist so readers can check our sources. Some point at regulators and archives. Others point at the platforms we are warning people about, because describing a site without letting readers see it is less useful.
A link is not an endorsement, and certainly not when the destination is a scam operator. We have no control over external content and it can change after we link to it. Once you leave legitreviewing.com you are subject to someone else’s terms and privacy practices.
What if something on the site is wrong or out of date?
Tell us. The subject matter moves quickly. Fraudulent operations rebrand, change domains and reopen under new names within weeks, so a description that was exact one month can be stale the next.
We publish on an as is basis, with no warranty that the site is complete, current or free of error, and none that it will be available without interruption. Verify anything critical against a primary source, particularly a regulator’s own register, before you act on it.
What are the limits of your liability?
Nothing here excludes liability for death or personal injury caused by our negligence, for fraud, or for anything else that cannot lawfully be excluded. Consumers keep their statutory rights.
Subject to that, LegitReviewing is not liable for indirect or consequential loss, loss of profit, loss of business, loss of data, losses arising from decisions you make on the basis of material published here, the acts of any independent adviser you engage after an introduction, or the content of any external site. Where liability can be limited but not excluded, our total liability is capped at one hundred United States dollars or the equivalent, reflecting the fact that legitreviewing.com is offered free to readers.
Which law applies?
These terms and any dispute arising from them are governed by the laws of the jurisdiction in which the operator of LegitReviewing is established, and the courts of that jurisdiction have exclusive jurisdiction.
If you are a consumer resident elsewhere, mandatory protection rules at home may give you rights this clause cannot take away, including the ability to bring proceedings locally. If a court finds a provision unenforceable, it is severed and the rest continues. Failure to enforce a term once is not a waiver of it later.
Can you close my access?
Yes. We can restrict or block access to legitreviewing.com, refuse messages from an address, or withdraw permission to use the site where these terms have been broken or where conduct is abusive, unlawful or damaging to other users.
We may also change, suspend or discontinue any part of the site, including removing or archiving articles published in 2026 or earlier. Publication is an editorial decision, not a service you have purchased, and no article is guaranteed to stay online in perpetuity. Questions go to contact@legitreviewing.com.